<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>intheav.com Blogs - Randy Hall - 123</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/</link><description>123</description><language>no</language><copyright>intheav.com</copyright><generator>intheav.com RSS-generator</generator><item><title>Yapp said we could youtube HS fights</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/03/02/yapp-said-we-could-youtube-hs-fights</link><description>I wanted to see if that was possible. 

Here are a few.

&lt;iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TGRFO5NonbU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;

&lt;iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Kmdx9BsWpek" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;

Our ubiquitous THUK 

&lt;iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8NiqEyTQMzI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;

Lancaster fights friends?

&lt;iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/E59cYVrsYM4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;


Did anyone else know this was out there? </description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:48:07 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Johnathon Ervin cost Darrin Parker the election.</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/03/01/johnathon-ervin-cost-darrin-parker-the-election</link><description>Johnathon Ervin cost Darrin Parker the election.

“Ervin secured his victory with the help of votes cast by some people who were neither Democrats nor members of the club until the night of the election. However, those votes were cast in accordance with the club's bylaws, which allow people to enroll in the club, fill out voter forms registering as Democrats and participate in an election.

When the results were challenged by the club's executive board, the election was nullified by the Los Angeles County Democratic Party, which deemed the club's rules too vague either to interpret or enforce.

When the executive board proposed new election rules and bylaw changes in January, the proposals were tabled by those who wanted the results of November's election to stand.

The tabling of the changes prompted a mass resignation by the club's officers, leaving the political organization with no leaders and no way to spend the political funds in its account in the days leading up to a Feb. 15 special election for Antelope Valley's seat in the state Senate.”

AVPRESS.com By: Bob Wilson


It also shows that even when rules are written down, when things don’t work out as donks feel they should, a donk will cut his nose off to spite his face. 

You can’t make this stuff up!

As our bypolar lanc would say, lololololo!</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:13:07 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Barack Obama's Presidency is a failure</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/02/25/barack-obama-s-presidency-is-a-failure</link><description>“…Tell me a time, not counting the Great War or its immediate successor World War II, when the world was in more turmoil.
 
If it were just Tunisia and Egypt and Libya and Bahrain we could say, "Well, we're not really surprised because (a) we have no idea where those places are and (b) we have no idea where those places are.

If it were just Madison, Wisconsin we could say, "Well, its Wisconsin and while we couldn't pinpoint it on a blank map we know its north of Louisiana and between New York and California." 

If it were just the President facing down the new Republican majority in the U.S. House over the budget, we could say "Didn't we go through this 15 years ago?" 
Dyanu - which is Hebrew for "It would have been enough for me." 
But it's all that and more. 

Everyone hates everyone even though we are in the middle of Barack Obama's first term - maybe only term - and wondering what happened to the promise of change, of a new tone, of a new approach. 

Let me be among the first to say that Barack Obama's Presidency is, at this point, a failure. 

He has overseen the loss of about 1,373 Democrats in the U.S. House; had to depend on bogus candidates nominated for the U.S. Senate to retain control of that Chamber; and his outreach to the Middle East ("My middle name is 'Hussein'") is not just a failure, but a failure of global proportions. 

Obama has had little to say about the fight over the rights of public employee unions in New Jersey, Wisconsin, or Ohio. He had nothing to say about the horrors taking place in Libya until he could - literally - hide behind the skirts of his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.

Remember that "3 AM" ad that Hillary ran during the primaries? When the call comes into the White House at 3 AM who do you want answering the phone? I think, if a lot of Democrats could revisit their answer to that, it would be President Hillary Clinton looking at all these issues.
 
New unemployment numbers will have come out by the time you read this, and I will be surprised if they have sunk under 9 percent.
 
Oil prices are on the rise. Crude closed at nearly $97 per barrel yesterday leading to higher prices at the pump, higher air fares, and higher prices for everything on the shelves at the Safeway…”

http://www.mullings.com/currentissue.htm

&lt;iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-bYlP90Nr-4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;

Don’t you wish Hillary was president right about now? 

I miss Bill!

Sarah!
</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:54:42 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Special interest served in Wisconson</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/02/22/special-interest-served-in-wisconson</link><description>"(CNSNews.com) - Two-thirds of the eighth graders in Wisconsin public schools cannot read proficiently according to the U.S. Department of Education, despite the fact that Wisconsin spends more per pupil in its public schools than any other state in the Midwest...."

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/two-thirds-wisconsin-public-school-8th-g

Teacher's response? Go out on strike for more money, pandering to the special interest public sector unions.

"In the peculiar Kabuki dance that comprises public political posturing these days, the Democrat/public employee union/left-wing activist alliance may have made a major miscalculation that will haunt them in the upcoming elections.


Maybe they were momentarily overwhelmed with nostalgia for the sixties.  Maybe they all fell asleep listening to an Alinsky audiobook, and were driven by subliminal suggestions.  Or perhaps they were just jealous of the success of the Tea Party rallies (a condition psychologists refer to as "T.P. Envy").


Regardless of the reason, I think there's a strong probability that the madness that has been on display in Madison, Wisconsin will have the exact opposite of the effect they'd hoped for.  


Clearly, their purpose in undertaking this circus was...well...actually, I'm not sure exactly what they thought they were going to accomplish.  


They could have thought that they were going to intimidate the legislature, especially by appearing outside their homes and frightening their families.  While such an experience must surely be unpleasant, anyone who has survived in the rough-and-tumble world of politics -- even at the level of a state legislature -- doesn't seem the kind who would buckle under to the pressure from a mob of angry teachers, most of whom probably can't control their classrooms, let alone the state legislature..."

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/02/doin_the_madison_misstep.html

"Government workers have taken to the streets in Madison, Wis., to battle a series of reforms proposed by Gov. Scott Walker that include allowing workers to opt out of paying dues to unions. Everywhere that this "opt out" idea has been proposed, unions have battled it vigorously because the money they collect from dues is at the heart of their power. 

Unions use that money not only to run their daily operations but to wage political campaigns in state capitals and city halls. Indeed, public-sector unions especially have become the nation's most aggressive advocates for higher taxes and spending. They sponsor tax-raising ballot initiatives and pay for advertising and lobbying campaigns to pressure politicians into voting for them. And they mount multimillion dollar campaigns to defeat efforts by governors and taxpayer groups to roll back taxes..."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703293204576105760131773034.html

Donks flee Madison so the Peopel's business can't be done. Pandering to the special interest monopoly public labor unions. 

Lesson: monopoly good. The people bad. 

Understand? 







</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:27:15 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Happy Valentine's Day!</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/02/14/happy-valentine-s-day</link><description>1. You love someone because of their imperfections not in spite of them:

2. You want someone who is secure and confident enough and not afraid  to tell you what you need to do better.

3. But you also don’t want that someone constantly carping.

4. You (well, at least not me) don’t want someone who is so spineless that they tell you everything you want to hear and do whatever you ask them to do. You don’t want someone who says “high high” if you say “jump.”  

5. You want someone who has a core (no, not a firm midsection, though that helps). A core set of beliefs and principles that define the person. Someone who stands firm and isn’t afraid.

6. You want to spend more time fighting together for the things you believe in than fighting each other. 

7. You want someone who is positive, who has fun living life. 

8. You would rather have someone with a checkered past who is honest about it and has learned from it than someone who tries to hide who they are or were. 

9. You want to think less about the wedding and courtship and more about the marriage or relationship. 

10. You want someone who you will know will always have your back.

&amp;#151; Tony Lee 

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=41788

</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:29:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Pittsburg 31 Green Bay 21</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/02/07/pittsburg-31-green-bay-21</link><description>Post scores here. </description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 01:47:02 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Schumer on the Three Branches of Government</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/02/01/schumer-on-the-three-branches-of-government</link><description>&lt;iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fG0Jpu9geWY" frameborder="0" allowFullScreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;

Just think we pay this guy! </description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 02:14:05 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Say Yes to Boys Who Say No </title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/01/27/say-yes-to-boys-who-say-no</link><description>“…It was highly unusual for girls in the 1950's to have interracial relationships, much less babies, with a man of a difference race.  During this time, however, the Communist Party of the United States encouraged women members to use their feminine wiles to entice men, especially black men, into the movement, as well as to reward the ones who joined up. ..

“…The American Left certainly has a long history of exploiting women.  For instance, during the 60's, Leftist girls were expected to, according to the slogan:  Say Yes to Boys Who Say No [to the Draft]…”

“…Radical women were brainwashed to believe that they needed to sacrifice their bodies for the Revolution. The women of the Weather Underground, for example, were required to have sex with any male who asked for it.

If a woman balked and demanded equality,  she was told that women's rights were secondary to liberating blacks and stopping the war. (Interestingly, the early suffragists were also instructed to put their needs on hold, which is why American women couldn't vote until 1920, 50 years after black men.)

On the rare occasion that a movement woman would protest, she'd face swift and harsh retribution…”

“…Like robotic Stepford Wives, progressive women of all ages follow their mostly male leaders.   Even women's studies departments have been hijacked by the Radical Left;   feminist professors support Radical Islam, regardless of the honor killings, stoning, and genital mutilation…”

“…I don't presume to know.  But I do know that millions of American women have been hoodwinked by those sweet-talking progressives.   And each new day,  another young woman falls under their hypnotic spell…”

Robinofberkeley.com 
</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:46:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Tim "Baywatch" Geithner</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/01/18/tim-baywatch-geithner</link><description>Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is the only person known to have had extensive plastic surgery to make himself look uglier. Sick to death of being admired for his beauty and not his economic brains, Tim "Baywatch" Geithner (as he used to be known) paid over $259,000 to have his face surgically re-constructed to resemble that of the sniggering cartoon character Beavis (from Beavis and Butthead). This lends a poignant twist to his nomination last year as one of People magazine's top 50 beautiful people. Originally, this was ascribed to the fact that Geithner's brother is a vice president at People. In fact, however, it was a tribute by those who remembered just how crazily handsome Geithner used to be. Geithner, however, has no regrets. "The way women used me—it was disgusting. I was nothing more than a piece of meat to them."</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:44:46 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Tax cut will create jobs</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/01/12/tax-cut-will-create-jobs</link><description>"...Like the rest of the tax package, cutting the payroll tax helps millions of American families keep their jobs, keep a roof over their heads, keep food on the table, and keep their kids in school, all while keeping our economic recovery moving in the right direction. It gives millions of Americans help where they need it most — in their wallets. And it puts us all more quickly on the road to a strong, robust, enduring economic recovery. A happy holiday, indeed."

Joe Biden is vice president of the United States.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2011-01-12-column12_ST2_N.htm

Roxi, I didn't see where Biden discriminated against the rich. 

If tax cuts are good why not more than 2%?

2% equals growth; what would more like say 15 or 25% equal? Yup a booming economy but a starving federal government. I can live with that. 

Glad the dems finally figured a economic truth out. Let the people keep their money and economies will grow. What ever happend to Keynes' theory? Obama proved it didn't work by increasing the debt by 60% in 4 years! 


</description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:45:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>USA is sitting on an ocean of oil</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/01/10/usa-is-sitting-on-an-ocean-of-oil</link><description>"Reston, VA - North Dakota and Montana have an estimated 3.0 to 4.3 billion barrels of undiscovered, technically recoverable oil in an area known as the Bakken Formation.

A U.S. Geological Survey assessment, released April 10, shows a 25-fold increase in the amount of oil that can be recovered compared to the agency's 1995 estimate of 151 million barrels of oil..."

http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1911

</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:14:43 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>WMDs</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2011/01/08/wmds</link><description>How the US let al-Qaida get its hands on an Iraqi weapons factoryIn an exclusive extract from his new book, A History of the World since 9/11, Dominic Streatfeild explains how despite expert warnings, the US let al-Qaida buy an arsenal of deadly weapons – then tried to cover it up

"...A small, nondescript town of a few thousand souls 25km south-west of Baghdad, Yusifiyah is known for its rich soil, which enables the production of potatoes famous throughout Iraq for their size and flavour. The singer Farouk al-Khatib was born here. But that's about it. For those uninterested in either potatoes or Iraqi popular music, there's little of interest: farms criss-crossed by irrigation ditches, a great deal of sand, and not much else.

Yusifiyah's obscurity, however, together with its convenient location – less than 30 minutes' drive from Baghdad airport – make it perfect for certain purposes: hiding things, for example. Things you'd rather no one ever knew about. Secret things.

Sure enough, 15km to the south lies a big, big secret. The secret dates back to 1977, when the then-president Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr ordered the construction of a vast munitions plant outside the town. Built by the Yugoslavs, the factory was originally to be named after Bakr himself, until Saddam Hussein seized power in 1979. In a fit of patriotic zeal, the fledgling dictator named it after the Iraqi general Qa'qaa ibn Umar, who in the seventh century inflicted a most glorious massacre on the Persian army in the second battle of Qasidiya: Al Qa'qaa.

Weapons inspectors who visited the facility were dumbstruck by the scale of the place. "Huge," comments one senior figure familiar with the site. "The biggest chemical plant I've ever seen." Covering an area of 36 square km, containing 1,100 buildings and employing more than 14,000 staff, the site was essentially a secret, self-sufficient city, 10 times the size of New York's Central Park – in the middle of the desert. It even had its own power station...."



http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/07/iraq-weapons-factory-al-qaida-us-failure</description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 20:18:42 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Merry Christmas</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2010/12/21/merry-christmas</link><description>I will give my liberal blogger friends the rest of the year off from my critical analysis of their lib viewpoints. 

May you all enjoy the Christmas season and to those that hate Christ I wish happy holidays!

Ho ho ho merry Christmas!</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:39:24 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>[F]or purposes of fairness</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2010/12/16/f-or-purposes-of-fairness</link><description>I’ve told Guy Marsh our Marxist revolutionary homosexual that his entire economic philosophy depends on the subjective 3rd grade-like concept of fairness. 

I’m now going to show you Obama thinks the same thing. 

“President Obama's statements were made on April 16, 2008, at the Democratic Party presidential debate which was broadcast by ABC News and moderated by ABC's Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos.  The transcript of the debate states:


GIBSON: All right.  You have, however, said you would favor an increase in the capital gains tax.  As a matter of fact, you said on CNBC, and I quote, "I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton," which was 28 percent.  It's now 15 percent.  That's almost a doubling, if you went to 28 percent.

But actually, Bill Clinton, in 1997, signed legislation that dropped the capital gains tax to 20 percent.

OBAMA: Right.

GIBSON: And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent.

OBAMA: Right.

GIBSON: And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money.  And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.

So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?

OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I've said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness.

We saw an article today which showed that the top 50 hedge fund managers made $29 billion last year -- $29 billion for 50 individuals.  And part of what has happened is that those who are able to work the stock market and amass huge fortunes on capital gains are paying a lower tax rate than their secretaries.  That's not fair.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/12/what_does_obama_believe_about.html



Mommy it’s not fair! Mommy make it fair! 

Is there any wonder you call it a nanny state? 

It doesn't matter if it doesn't work because Obama only cares about fairness as he jets around in Air Force One from one vacation to the next. </description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:19:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>If democrats believe...</title><link>http://www.intheav.com/blogs/Randy Hall/2010/12/14/if-democrats-believe</link><description>"If the Democrats believe Clinton's tax increases led to a boom economy and Bush's tax cuts destroyed the economy, why do they want to extend the Bush tax rates?" -Rush</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:50:46 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
