User Profile
Search
Blog Viewer
My Blog
Sunday, December 06 2009 - 03:23 PM
Demonstrating the catastrophe of huge numbers of illegal immigration.
lancaster says...
if we don’t take in immigrants,
WHO WILL BE OUR SLAVE CLASS???
( send private message )
marino says...
lancaster,
We annually accept more legal immigrants than any other country by far. And now we are supporting 10’s of millions of illegals, along with their crimes.
(
send private message
)
marino says...
Go to NumbersUSA.com to give congressmen, our governor, our president, a piece of your mind. Get involved in some fashion.
( send private message )
lancaster says...
i’m not argueing that with u marino.
there are 2 crimes being commited here.
1. we have a person, coming to our country illegally. for the most part,
to better they’re lives.
2. we have a large group of people hiring illegals. for the most part,
TO SAVE LARGE SUMS OF MONEY, and more detremental to the american people,
TO DRIVE DOWN OUR WAGES AND CAUSE DESTRUCTION TO OUR WAY OF LIFE.
which do u think i hold in lower esteem?
(
send private message
)
lancaster says...
if we did not bother any illegal in any way, from here till…
but went after every business or individual, who hires a illegal, and put all of our resources to help all business to identify, and then NOT hire illegals, we would see a mass exodus of illegals out of our country.
(
send private message
)
marino says...
Lanc,
The government isn’t going after companys that hire illegals. That’s what bothers me. They are allowing it.
Teenagers that go for their first job often flip burgers. They can’t get that right now. You have mostly middle aged illegal aliens working fast food places.
The current 62% teenage unemployment rate is the highest is recent history.
The U.S. government wants illegal aliens and they don’t care what you think about it. I would report every business that hires illegals in a heartbeat, but there ain’t a damn thing that would happen to them except for a few token ICE raids.
Bush and Obama were/are on the same boat when it comes to enforcing immigration laws.
(
send private message
)
marino says...
Lanc,
That’s what I’m trying to do is get the government to fine and/or jail employers that hire illegals. That’s the reason I mention NumbersUSA.com as often as I do. They use us to send faxes to the nuts running this country, to put pressure on them. We need to let them know they are going to be replaced, and then do so.
(
send private message
)
lancaster says...
well golly gee, marino. i agree with you. and i would love to see the fine
large enough, to make it non-profitable enough to wipe out any gain.
but this is were i agree with SS.
business owns us.
just watched robin williams come up with a great idea.
he suggested our representatives’ be forced to wear jackets, like race car drivers, that list all thier “SPONSORS”.
(
send private message
)
lancaster says...
i always try to stay away from suggesting jail.
besides the fact that it feels like someone out there won’t be happy till everyone is in jail, it’s usually some poor smuck who ends up taking a fall for the ones who are responsible for the crime.
(
send private message
)
CASimons says...
We could start in our own backyard! I already offered to name names of businesses in both cities. Nope, no takers. These small business that accept illegals avoid paying a myriad of taxes that cost you and I millions of dollars in lost revenue and productivity.
( send private message )
hobojunction says...
I have to agree with lancaster. If businesses were held to the law this wouldnt be happening.
Businesses have been allowed to exploit the illegals for years and now we’re paying for it.
Lets Hold Mayor Parris’s feet to the fire with the new city ordinance enforcing the law on illegals. We HAVE to start someplace.
Lets get the names out there that are skirting the law and ask our city government what they’re doing to enforce their own laws.
(
send private message
)
dbeardw says...
Hobo – we do at times and nothing gets done. I mentioned Charlie Brown’s last week and asked a confidante over there if anything happened. Nope! According to my contact they’ve got illegals using phony social security cards and numbers, someone on section 8 getting paid under the table and all getting welfare, and the list goes on. But who’s going to touch Charlie Brown’s and look into that?
The problem is that the locally elected officials don’t want to do anything. As the church lady Marquez told me at lunch she is so ‘mad’ the federal government isn’t cleaning up the mess. Well with the mess the federal government has on its plate do we wait for them or do our mayors go in and enforce the law except if they’re friends, compadres, or tightly knit to investigate the transgressions of someone they personally know.
Round and round we go with no one doing anything. When’s the last time you read about a raid on a business? It’s just not the construction industry. IT’S EVERYWHERE IN TOWN!!!
(
send private message
)
mattkeltner says...
Drone aircraft will be used to nab illegal immigrants on California-Mexico border
Los Angeles Times
December 7, 2009 | 7:33 am
Predator drones, the unmanned aircraft used by the U.S. military in the Iraq and Afghanistan war zones, will soon be employed to track illegal immigrants on the Mexico-California border.
The drone, which will be unveiled later today, will be operated out of the Antelope Valley by the military contractor General Atomics. The drones will fly above the border region with advancing electronic tracking equipment looking for illegal immigrants crossing into California.
According to the San Diego-based company, the drones will transmit information to U.S. authorities on human smuggles as well drug smuggling.
Such drones are already used on the border of Texas and Arizona.
Border Patrol officials told SignOn San Diego that the drone would initially be used to monitor ocean area, which has been used by human smugglers.
— Shelby Grad
(
send private message
)
roxi says...
Newsflash: Drones to be based 7 miles from Lake Los Angeles to patrol the border! Ignore the fact that the base is over 100 miles from the border…..
They can just swoop over Charlie Brown’s & record the illegal population! Then the video can record all the Desert Rats living in the desert illegally in their Rv’s…! Looks like Parris got his $500K of private funding?
( send private message )
marino says...
Using Drones and not fining employers is like trying to keep fish out of your part of the lake while you still throw bait in.
( send private message )
dbeardw says...
Roxi – what’s $500K of private funding to mayor Rex. Did you ever think something he wants would not materialize in some form or another.
Lancaster really should have an ordinance that if you don’t make at least $1 million/year you can’t run for mayor. There’s such a need for so much cash to be floating around for these little projects.
(
send private message
)
Grumpy says...
“Schizophrenia often results in a loss of contact with reality, such as holding false ideas about what is taking place and the acceptance of mutually contradictory beliefs….”
I would call our national attitude toward illegal immigration a form of social schizophrenia.
Our controlling majority political party (Democrat) wants the maximum number of illegal immigrants to arrive, settle in, get motor-voter registered, and dependably vote Democratic.
At the same time, they have to pander to that portion of their voter base that is productively employed but at risk from newcomers willing to work for less, and also to their existing huge non-productive welfare base who fear the newcomers will dilute their share of the freebees.
The result is a schizophrenic kluge of actions, where blame is heaped on businesses (a class that, by liberal dogma, is intrinsically evil) for hiring the illegals, while simultaneously avoiding any attempt to identify and deal with the illegals themselves or to dilute the array of welfare benefits we offer to attract them.
(
send private message
)
lancaster says...
always nice to see a repub tell us dems what “we’re” doing.
grumpy, good thing reagan didn’t approve of amnesty. (to the tune of 2 million), or lil W trying to hide amnesty behind the whole “guest worker” program!
(
send private message
)
roxi says...
G:"The result is a schizophrenic kluge of actions, where blame is heaped on businesses (a class that, by liberal dogma, is intrinsically evil) for hiring the illegals, while simultaneously avoiding any attempt to identify and deal with the illegals themselves or to dilute the array of welfare benefits we offer to attract them. "
You watch Glen Beck too much. Unbeknownst to you…..illegals were welcome with open arms since Reagan. Democratic Party is just walking behind the elephant, picking up the dung.
( send private message )
roxi says...
We gleefully drive to Lancaster to get good tires, just like we love to go to Costco and give Lancaster the tax revenue. This Schzio-sludge of antagonism is only a front. More ink for the presses.
( send private message )
lancaster says...
we dems will try to be “nicer” to all the business’s who are just trying to protect themselves from the american workers.
it’s not like american workers are worth paying minimum wage to, not to mention all those taxes.
poor, poor lil business’s.
bad, bad dems!!
(
send private message
)
Grumpy says...
Ah, got a rise out of ’yall.
And your answers to the points I made are…..?
(
send private message
)
lancaster says...
go after the cause. no jobs, no illegals coming for them.
no jobs, illegals going home.
rather simple.
but if u really, really want to go after the lil brown man instead, well…
(
send private message
)
Grumpy says...
Yes, but that’s just one aspect.
Don’t you think living here on welfare (and birthing a new US citizen who will, hopefully, have a better life here) us better than a dirt floor in Mexico?
You see, the problem is that anything you do is, by definition, going after the “lil brown man”.
We’re dealing with what is known as a conundrum.
(
send private message
)
roxi says...
Gr:Don’t you think living here on welfare (and birthing a new US citizen who will, hopefully, have a better life here) us better than a dirt floor in Mexico?
ah don’na think yu know nothin’ about birthin’ no babies…
say as you will, you’ve been here much longer than those birthin’ babies that are now fighting our wars. say as you will, they could’ve been birthed on a dirt floor in mx., but if were not, what’s your point?
Will we WIN this WAR, which is so IMPORTANT – or will we remain complacent and bitch about immigration?
Jus’ wonderin’
( send private message )
roxi says...
To put down a ‘brown man’ a ‘black man’ an asian or an indian who are citizens by whatever accomplishment is a discredit to the U.S.
To promote war, to promote nation building or to deny citizenship to those who have served, and to degrade without a conscience is blasphemy.
The War is so important for Dick Cheney and the NeoCons to win. At what length will they disgrace the American public into gaining that ‘win’?
( send private message )
Cybertariat says...
I believe that the catastrophe demonstrated by this thread is the fact that capitalism with its private and thus illogical ownership of the means of production and the accompanying economic exploitation of workers is the cause for economic hardship and insecurity for all workers; that it forces workers to leave their native lands and secure employment elsewhere; that immigration laws and related employment laws, regardless of their being promoted by Republicans or Democrats, ultimately and only serve the capitalist class. Therefore, the most important matter facing the American working class is the elimination of the capitalist system and the long overdue esatblishmen of socialist society. Short of that, the only change we will ever see will be the worsening of all aspects of capitalist society, including undocumented immigration, until that society is reduced to social anarchy that will usher in a new form of feudalism.
*
Ten Myrhs And Facts About Undocumented Workers
*
Undocumented workers and unemployment
*
Capitalism: ‘The borders remain porous’
Yours in revolution.
Persevere.
Guy
( send private message )
Randy Hall says...
“I believe that the catastrophe demonstrated by this thread is the fact that capitalism with its private and thus illogical ownership of the means of production and the accompanying economic exploitation of workers is the cause for economic hardship and insecurity for all workers; that it forces workers to leave their native lands and secure employment elsewhere; that immigration laws and related employment laws, regardless of their being promoted by Republicans or Democrats, ultimately and only serve the capitalist class.”
Then why is the more capitalist a country is the more desirable it is for workers seeking less hardship?
“Short of that, the only change we will ever see will be the worsening of all aspects of capitalist society, including undocumented immigration, until that society is reduced to social anarchy that will usher in a new form of feudalism.”
Since the average “worker” can own a home, car, and leisure activity, why such pessimism? What exactly do you see that makes you feel that we need to revolutionary charge how we live today? You want more than you have, you want others to have what you earned?
Why do you have to be a hater of capitalism to be a socialist? Why do you have to be so pessimistic to be a socialist? Why do you have to see only the negative in the “green movement?”
(
send private message
)
Grumpy says...
All countries are both capitalist and socialist to a degree for the simple reason that neither pure socialism nor pure capitalism works well.
In a purely socialist country the productive segment, which has no choice but to work to support the parasites without reaping any additional privilege, either revolts or simply quits and joins the parasite class (remember the famous Soviet Union worker’s description of his life: “We pretend to work and they pretend to pay us”). Eventually it all breaks down, as we all observed.
In a purely capitalist country without social controls business and industry has little incentive to pamper the workers beyond what is absolutely necessary to keep them going, again leading to mass dissatisfaction among the population.
As the tightrope walker said, “balance is everything”.
(
send private message
)
Randy Hall says...
How do we know pure capitalism doesn’t work? Didn’t we jump to the lead in industry when capitalism was unfettered?
( send private message )
lancaster says...
maybe u should ask the people of the southern cone of so. america.
after milton and the chicago school boys had thier way with them, capitalist became a dirty word.
(
send private message
)
Grumpy says...
Randy: I base my opinion about the need for some “socialist” control of capitalism on the early days of America’s industrial expansion.
While yes, it was the period when capitalism made America an industrial powerhouse and world power, a lack of concern for the workers caused all kinds of strife, leading to unions and legal restrictions & standards.
Also, without controls capital became so concentrated in a few ‘titans’ (think Standard Oil Trust) that the country appeared to be drifting toward becoming the fifedom of a few mega-corporations run by un-elected individuals.
Its all about placing limits on the power any one segment of society can wield over another.
(
send private message
)
Randy Hall says...
So if capitalism is the market unfettered and socialism is telling the market everything to do, should the balance be 50/50?
What kind of fetters should we remove because they are bankrupt and what fetters should we modify because we know they don’t work (welfare reform)?
Since everything is emotionally driven how would you measure marketplace success (greatest good for the greatest number)?
(
send private message
)
Randy Hall says...
Lancaster in trying to control inflation the tariffs were removed and that allowed out of country produced goods to flow in. The workers in the “protected” jobs did suffer, but 500% inflation to 10% would have lead to increased satisfaction eventually as their currency stabilized.
( send private message )
Randy Hall says...
Guy, if we institute socialism via revolution in the USA, isn’t that just fixing one country and doesn’t that doom your revolution to failure.
http://www.worldsocialism.org/articles/pinochet_and_socialism.php
(
send private message
)
Ray Cunneff says...
Once again, Grumpy has it right. Unfettered capitalism of the 19th Century led to centralization of wealth and power in monopolies and “trusts” that controlled much of the U.S. economy.
President Theodore Roosevelt became known as the “trust-buster”, dissolving 44 trusts in his two terms as president (although his successor, William Howard Taft, broke up over twice as many in one term).
(
send private message
)
Ray Cunneff says...
Teddy Roosevelt was hardly a socialist, but he recognized the inequities of unfettered capitalism.
( send private message )
lancaster says...
not what ray? i meant what RH?
wouldn’t it be nice if we implemented the laws we have?
like the shermen act?
no more too big to fail!
where’s teddy when ya need him?
(
send private message
)
Randy Hall says...
lancaster, I’m with you, no business is too big to fail. Take the risk out of anything even unemployment and you get more of it.
( send private message )
Grumpy says...
Regarding the balance to strike between capitalism and socialism, being primarily a pragmatist I would tilt heavily toward the side that has been demonstrated to work best. That, in case anyone hasn’t noticed, is capitalism.
The reason capitalism has been so successful is that it accommodates and is powered along by the true nature of human beings, whereas successful socialism, if there were such a thing, would depend on humans consistently acting against their evolved-in patterns of behavior.
The endlessly parroted argument that the reason socialist societies fail is because they weren’t examples of “true” socialism is thin, thin, thin. Socialism has been tried over and over and even when the society is carefully structured and populated entirely by dedicated socialists (such as here in our own AV with Llano del Rio), always they come up against human nature and eventually fall apart.
BTW, thanks all, this is a lot more fun than working outside in the cold!
(
send private message
)
Randy Hall says...
I’ve made the argument that socialism is a new religion or morality that goes against human nature that working for some else’s good before your own is destructive.
G you are right even socialist recognize capitalism is necessary to put in the required infrastructure to even contemplate socialism. Also it took those willing to risk everything such as Getty to make something that needed to be “fettered.” Since that is what works why not export what worked for us and draw the world up to our level instead of transforming our society into something that is at best a bloody theory!
(
send private message
)
mattkeltner says...
In the economies of the Nordic nations (Norway, Sweden,Denmark,Finland,Germany, Austria, Switzerland) capitalism was harnessed for the benefit of all citizens.
This had two benefits:
1.)the market was protected and capitalism was preserved.(European capitalism is a different conception than the idea put forth by Americans)
2.)It served to use capitalism to work for the common good of all, providing funding for social programmes, elderly care, university/trade school education, market regulation and trade laws that benefited workers.
Unfortunately, I don’t think the Nordic model is sustainable in the U.S. anymore.
Even in a heavily-Germanic/Swedish state like Minnesota that once provided generous welfare benefits, they have been experiencing problems due to people from Chicago, Milwaukee and Detroit finding out about the generosity of Minnesotans and then relocating to Minneapolis or St. Paul to take advantage of the states benefits.
(
send private message
)
Randy Hall says...
Taking advantage, sounds like they need to be buried up to their neck and a harrow run over them, like Pol Pott did. Torture followed by death works every time it is tried. “My mind’s right boss!”
( send private message )
dbeardw says...
Matt – anyone who lives in Minnesota should get some sound benefits. Ever been there. The freezing temperatures. How much do you think it costs just to keep warm?
Randy says: “Torture followed by death works every time it is tried.” I tell you, the more Randy talks the more we learn about his dark side. Wonder if that includes children too.
(
send private message
)
Cybertariat says...
Randy Hall: “…they should be buried up to their necks and have a harrow run over them…”
*
Mohandas Gandhi: “I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ.”
back to it… :-)
( send private message )
Randy Hall says...
Guy, you pick on my language skills but missed my sarcasm. Go figure. I expect that from a liberal but certinally not you. Is Pol Pott a revolutionary like you; or is Pol Pott a Christian like me?
Hummm, odd reading of my post guys.
(
send private message
)
lancaster says...
death to welfare cheats???
and we can have public floggings for j-walkers.
limbs cut off for shoplifting?
prison for people in debt?
golly, what a wonderful world we would have if toyboy was king!!!!!
(
send private message
)
Randy Hall says...
I have always been told sarcasm is over the average reader’s head. I’ll be more careful of the average in the future. To say I’m surprised at the lack of comprehension at my use of sarcasm is enlightening.
I’ll be more aware of my reader’s reading liabilities in the future. My apologies.
(
send private message
)
Cybertariat says...
Sarcasm or no sarcasm, cuz, when I think of Gandhi’s aforementioned quote, you always come to mind.
Out!
(
send private message
)
lancaster says...
or maybe it’s just we find it easy to believe such statements from u, have more to do with ur reality then u admit to.
reminds me of a woman i once knew.
used to make some nasty lil remarks to people, and always followed them up with “JUST KIDDING”!
and if no one laughed, it was thier lack of humor that was at fault.
might that apply here?
(
send private message
)
mattkeltner says...
I think of Ghandi’s quote about Christ and Christians whenever I see a huge megachurch or a pastor driving a brand new sports car or Mercedes-Benz.
Thankfully, however, I know that not all who profess to be Christians or pastors are like that, and I try not to label everyone accordingly.
I have always had the gift of a strong intuition and I can tell you, within fifteen minutes of walking into a church, if it is a safe and loving place.
Randy Hall says...
Cuz, I’d be “out” if I was you and was asked this question; Is Pol Pott a revolutionary like you; or is Pol Pott a Christian like me?
The rest of you, context, context, context.
(
send private message
)
Randy Hall says...
“[U]sed to make some nasty lil remarks to people” like “toyboy”, but without the “just kidding.” Perfect! I could not have made this up!
( send private message )
Grumpy says...
From the Dept. of Southernisms: You are supposed to follow the snippy remark with “Bhess his heart”
As in “she always TRIES to look nice, bless her heart”.
(
send private message
)
marino says...
NumbersUSA.com. Thanks for checking it out.
( send private message )
Cybertariat says...
For archival and retrieval purposes, I have elected to respond elsewhere (seventy-seventh comment post) to a few or the comments and questions concernng capitalism and socialism that were presented within this thread by Grumpy, Matt, and Randy.
Thank you.
Persevere. Guy
( send private message )
lancaster says...
i’m “NOT” kidding when i call u toyboy.
( send private message )
Randy Hall says...
I knew that. That is why it is priceless!
( send private message )
Would you like to comment on this blog post? Login to talk back!
CASimons says...
Thank you for posting this.
( send private message )