User Profile
God, Family and Country. In that order!
» View Sovereignty Soldier's profile
» Send Private Message
Search
Blog Viewer
Re-Education For Lauryn Hill
Wednesday, May 30 2012 - 05:52 PM
Agenda 21 To Be Discussed at
Agenda 21 To Be Discussed at Bilderberg Confab
Global warming alarmist Redford to attend elite conference
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
The attendance of Alberta Premier and global warming alarmist Alison Redford at this year’s Bilderberg conference, during which she will discuss “ecological challenges,” confirms that Agenda 21 and the bid to re-brand the stuttering climate change power grab will be core issues at the elitist confab set to take place tomorrow.
“According to a government news release, Redford will meet with a number of individuals to discuss topics like monetary policy, ecological challenges and responsible development of natural resources,” reports CBC News.
Redford’s attendance at the clandestine meeting of global power brokers is costing Canadian taxpayers $19,000 dollars.
Her appearance represents yet another example of how Bilderberg is not merely a talking shop but an active consensus-making forum for people in positions of power. Redford will be scheming with power brokers from foreign countries in complete secrecy and with total disregard for her democratic obligations to the Canadian people.
Redford is an aggressive advocate of the man-made explanation behind climate change. During an election debate earlier this year, she attacked Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith as a national embarrassment simply because Smith dared to suggest that the science on global warming was not settled.
Redford’s advocacy for more controls on carbon emissions is directly in line with the Obama administration’s war against America’s coal industry and the wider Bilderberg agenda for a “post-industrial revolution,” where energy use will be severely restricted in the name of saving the earth, leading to plummeting living standards.
The United Nations’ Agenda 21 project demands that member nations adopt “sustainable development” policies that are little more than a disguise for the reintroduction of neo-feudalism and only serve to reduce living standards and quality of life.
The true motivation behind this agenda was recently unveiled at the ‘Planet Under Pressure’ conference in London, during which climate change alarmists presented their blueprint for humans to be packed into denser cities so that the rest of the planet can be surrendered to mother nature. This process is already well underway in California where laws passed to mitigate car use and carbon dioxide emissions have led to policies that mandate up to 30 homes be built on a single acre of land.It’s a similar idea to the nightmare ‘Planned-Opolis’ proposal put out by the Forum for the Future organization last year, in which human activity will be tightly regulated by a dictatorial technocracy in the name of saving the planet, with cars for personal use banned and only accessible to members of the elite.
The mindset of this gaggle of arrogant, scoffing elitists in their drive to micro-manage the human race, which they regard as a plague on the earth, was best encapsulated by the following quote from ‘Planet Under Pressure’ attendee and Yale University professor Karen Seto.
“We certainly don’t want them (humans) strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely [together],” Seto told MSNBC.
Bilderberg elitists like Redford will no doubt be sharing similar rhetoric at this week’s confab, which kicks off on Thursday at the Westfields Marriott Washington Dulles hotel in Chantilly, Virginia.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
Tags: bilderberg, Environment
CMGINAV says...
That is exactly it. Movies like Metropolis are very telling. Is it just a coincidence that movies like this or books like 1984 are so scary accurate with the world today? Is it just coincidence that in an interview published in the New York World February 17, 1921, Mr. Henry Ford put the case for the “Protocols of Zion” tersely and convincingly. He said: “The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.”
The only mistake he made was blaming all of it on jews when in reality there are numerous groups vying for world dominance. The Protocols were not written by “jews” but by those who hate jews and wanted to cast blame on them if the book were ever discovered.
( send private message )
AV Town Crier says...
CMG
Very true. The NWO is made up of a lot of different people (including those you would think are at odds with each other, like Muslims and Jews).
You mention Metropolis, what about Fahrenheit 451 (I may have gotten the number wrong. My memory is failing). The movie is very interesting.
(
send private message
)
Cagy Wolf says...
Every generation education drops lower and dumbing down the population and so is the conditioning of our children in public schools. My grand daughter got wrote up for defending herself.
( send private message )
Cybertariat says...
Or “My granddaughter found herself ‘written up’ for her having defended herself.”
“Dumbed down” indeed.
( send private message )
Grumpy says...
The purpose of the Bilderberg Group gatherings is to allow various mucky-mucks from government, finance, business, academic, media & others to get together and openly discuss the world situation(s) with some level of assurance that they can speak frankly without being subjected to the selectively out-of-context edited “gotcha” stuff the media lives on.
The presumption is that this helps everyone understand where others are “coming from” and hopefully generates some good ideas for smoothing at least a few of the world’s multitude of problems.
Now, exactly what any given participant might do with these insights & ideas when they get back to their home jobs is anyone’s guess, but whatever they do or don’t do, they are the same people in the same position with the same level of authority they had prior to attending. The group itself has no power that exceeds the power of the individual participants; they are not a world government nor do they set or even influence the policies of governments except in the most indirect way.
Another thing to note is that the group is virtually entirely composed of “Westerners”, i.e. west Europe and the Americas. As far as I can tell, there is only the slightest participation by anyone from the Communist/Socialist powers and none whatsoever by the world’s “problem children”, the Islamic bloc. Therefore, it is obvious that any influence the group might have would be limited to less than half the world, which essentially is the exact same “order” we have right now, hardly conducive to a “new world order”, don’t you think?
(
send private message
)
AV Town Crier says...
No so. They are in control of monetary policy via central banking (of which most civilized countries are part of.)In this country, our central bank is the privately run federal Reserve system. Our government borrows from them, thus we are always in dept. They get interest on the money loaned, plus they control inflation at their will.
One of the fabled Rothchilds (back in the 1920’s) once said about central banking; let me control the currency and I won’t need an army to conqueror with.
Don’t be fooled, the Bilderberg group represents the controlling interests of the world’s currency. And all the financial BS that is happening in the world didn’t happen by accident—there’s an evil plan afoot.
While they, themselves aren’t the leaders of the NWO, they represent some of the main players.
(
send private message
)
Cagy Wolf says...
Cyberidiot at least I have children to be concerned about, what do you have? You don’t even have a job and you live with mommy, isn’t time to cut the cord and stand up like a man.
( send private message )
Cybertariat says...
Yes, you are below-average intelligence, racist, drug-addled and impulse-controlless white trash, but you have in fact managed to reproduce. Lucky us. Oh, lucky us.
Persevere.
Good day.
Guy
( send private message )
Cagy Wolf says...
Cyberretard lucky for the world you did not reproduce, the world is filled enough with blind slow witted marxism morons.
( send private message )
roxi says...
05/31/12 – 01:47 AM
AV Town Crier says…
No so. They are in control of monetary policy via central banking (of which most civilized countries are part of.)In this country, our central bank is the privately run federal Reserve system. Our government borrows from them, thus we are always in dept. They get interest on the money loaned, plus they control inflation at their will.
_______________________
Actually, the United States Treasury gives our money to the Fed, and yes, they in turn invest it in their wild international “investment” schemes and turn a profit. They also pay our debts, I believe — like to their buddies in China.
This is what Rob-me means when he says that Obama doesn’t ‘understand’ his Brand of Capitalism.
(
send private message
)
AV Town Crier says...
Roxi
That was true in the days and weeks following enactment of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Once we were in dept, the US Treasury is out of the minting business. Look at your fiat money;it’s a Federal Reserve note. Our entire budget (legislated by the crooks we call congress) authorizes the borrowing of fiat money from the Fed. We rarely pay off any interest let alone principal (which is created every year with a new budget)
Bubba Bill was the last President to balance a budget (meaning that the interest for that year was paid. Not on past years nor on principal). Every dollar congress borrows cost more than a dollar to repay—so it will never get paid off. The Fed may sell off some of our dept to China and Saudi Arabia, etc. But it’s their money and they can do as they see fit. Where do you think the IMF gets their money? Clue; not from participating governments, but from the central banks of those governments.
(
send private message
)
AV Town Crier says...
Roxi
Our govt runs on the concept of Peter robbing Mary to pay Paul. In that concept Peter is the government. In that scenario, Peter will always have the support of Paul. (Note; in this scenario, Paul is the Federal Reserve)
(
send private message
)
roxi says...
Right, you call this system Peter, Paul and Mary, and I call it Oligarchy – it’s all part of the rigged system Rob-me and many others call their Brand of Capitalism, and accuse others of “not understanding”, which is true, because they’re the only one’s who benefit from it — all 4 of them.
( send private message )
roxi says...
Btw, this ruse to ‘balance the budget’ is exactly that. The Right has no sincere interest in balancing the budget, as their entire system is based on debt that the taxpayers pay, and they continue to run up.
So, yes, this system is programmed in their favor to NEVER pay off the principle or the interest. That is not their intention. Their intention is to Ghettoize the country.
(
send private message
)
roxi says...
Do we continue to allow these Vampire Capitalists to suck out the life of this country, because if we do, we’ll end up just like Ireland, Spain and Greece:
Ireland votes on Europe’s deficit-fighting treaty
SHAWN POGATCHNIK
From Associated Press
May 31, 2012 12:54 PM EDT
DUBLIN (AP) — Saying yes could mean dooming Ireland to more long, hard years of austerity. But saying no could mean national bankruptcy next year.
Ireland’s debt-burdened voters confronted an existential dilemma Thursday as they decided in a referendum whether to ratify the European Union’s deficit-fighting treaty, a measure backed by Germany as a confidence-building measure but criticized by many economists as exactly the wrong kind of medicine for countries drowning in red ink.
(snip)
______________________
(
send private message
)
Grumpy says...
Roxi: “….entire system is based on debt…”
AVTC: “Our govt runs on the concept of Peter robbing Mary to pay Paul.”
My take is that while both statements about “the system” are true, they only describe the effects of the system’s operation, not the system itself.
Essentially, all our modern civil societies are built on the premise of continual expansion. We live on debt because it is accepted as a given that there always will be more and more people, more and more housing being built, more and more widgets being consumed, more and more taxpayers to pay taxes. Why worry, we’ll make it up tomorrow.
This has worked (relatively) well for us for a long time but it is just like building an entire energy infrastructure on the assumption there will always be oil to pump….sooner or later it must end. I won’t be around to see it, but it will most definitely be painful.
(
send private message
)
Sovereignty Soldier says...
05/31/12 – 12:00 AM
Grumpy says…
The purpose of the Bilderberg Group gatherings is to allow various mucky-mucks from government, finance, business, academic, media & others to get together and openly discuss the world situation(s) with some level of assurance that they can speak frankly without being subjected to the selectively out-of-context edited “gotcha” stuff the media lives on.
That is almost word for word what their excuse for creating groups like Bilderburg. So they want to make suggestions they know the masses of people would be against. Proposals like Carbon taxes and making criminal any who would scoff at the created crisis of global warming. Suggestions like microchipping people. Discussions on how best to manipulate people.
These are globalist criminals who are coordinating their attacks on the masses and consolidating their influence and power. This is the real mafia! Those who would be apologists for them, truly do not understand their purpose and goals.
( send private message )
Sovereignty Soldier says...
The worlds problem children? I think you lack empathy Grumpy. How would you like foreign troops to be on our streets, telling our politicians what to do, stopping us moving freely about our own nation of birth, and then have troops who have been through multiple tours and are on psychtropic drugs open fire on civilians or rape young women? Would you become a “problem child” or would you roll over and take it?
( send private message )
Sovereignty Soldier says...
One more thing Grumpy. If you asked the media about Bilderburg 5 years ago they were still denying it and calling people conspiracy theorists. Now they admit it exists. Why did they lie before?
Remember, nothing done in secret is good!
( send private message )
Sovereignty Soldier says...
Roxi the Treasury prints the money true enough. The Federal Reserve tell the Treasury how much to print. Then the Treasury gives it to the central bank. So technically you are right but it is a technicality.
( send private message )
Sovereignty Soldier says...
Just come out and say it Roxi. Your a socialist. You hate capitalism and the fact some have more than you. Your a jealous person. If you just came out and stated your a socialist/commie who hates America it would solve the whole debating you on any issues. You just want Americas’ destruction and enslavement. You think it will level things for you, or maybe that by supporting it your on the inside but companies like Monsanto cut across party lines and their products are killing all indiscriminately. Know this though, you will NEVER see socialism in America. This nation would rip itself apart before certain folks would allow that.
( send private message )
Grumpy says...
SS: “The worlds problem children? I think you lack empathy Grumpy.”
I don’t lack it, I only ration it. But in point of fact I do have empathy for the world’s problem children. They are locked into a religo-political system that glorifies the constant violence they engage in (which, BTW, is not limited to those countries where America has or has had troops). I do indeed feel sorry for them and would fix it if I could.
(
send private message
)
Cybertariat says...
The SS: “Just come out and say it, roxi, you’re a socialist [sic].”
Idiocy! No one here would like it more than what I would were roxi to be a socialist, but the non-debatable fact of the matter is that it is I who remains this forum’s only socialist.
back to it…
Guy R. Marsh
Lancaster, California
Member-at-large (since 1990):
Socialist Labor Party of America (est. 1890)
http://www.slp.org/"
( send private message )
marino says...
Good eye, SS. Some of us are able to spot a socialist from a mile away.
And it takes no rocket surgeon to spot Obama.
(
send private message
)
Cagy Wolf says...
Cyberidiot thank God for that, that you are the only socialist scum on this site
( send private message )
roxi says...
Yes, I endorse Cybertariate as the only Socialist in this forum. After all, I do like to shop – so I must be a Capitalist.
( send private message )
roxi says...
Bait another broad, SS – this chick don’t hunt.
( send private message )
avbornbred says...
If Cyberdude actually lived in the real world, having to work, pay bills and a mortgage, and raise a family, he might not be the Socialist-Marxist-Communist-Atheist-Anti American Chud he is.
( send private message )
Ray Cunneff says...
I really don’t think about this crap. Most of you know I’m an Obama supporter. You know I despise ultra-conservative right-wingers. You know how how I’m going to vote. We disagree.
So let’s us agree to disagree and drop the personal attacks?
(
send private message
)
Ray Cunneff says...
The right-wingers can’t help themselves, personal attacks are their bread-and-butter.
( send private message )
roxi says...
My Summer Reading List:
1. Ethics in Politics by Karl Rove
2. The Art of Compromise by John Boehner (foreword by Mitch McConnell)
3. Women’s Rights by Rush Limbaugh
4. See the USA on $40 a Day by Mitt Romney
5. Economic Growth by George W Bush
(
send private message
)
Cagy Wolf says...
stfu ray ur an idiot
cyberpunk is ur buddy so who cares who u vote for. obama is the worse president since fdr.
as for cybepunk he lives with mommy so he can sponge off her and not work. what a loser
( send private message )
Martel says...
I would finally hope ALL of us can debate without the insults.Really when you stop and think about it why are we so quick to insult or attack someone with a different point of view,the whole idea of being Americans is freedom to think for ourselfs and express our beliefs.
( send private message )
AV Town Crier says...
Martel
Right on.
I doubt that Roxi is a socialists or anti-American. In fact, by expressing her free-thought, she is what America is all about. You go girl (I can’t believe I just quoted Oprah—somebody shoot me, now!)
I will disagree with Roxi (the commie-pinko, rat-fink) it’s not a Repulicrap (conservative) issue. The Demicraps (liberals) are just as much at fault. When it comes to the big money in this world, both sides are in bed together (the perverts!)
Ray, don’t forget Richard M. Nixon’s ‘I Am Not A Crook’ book.
(
send private message
)
Cybertariat says...
roxi: “…I do like to shop. So I must be a capitalist.”
Actually, roxi, although there certainly is an ideological and thus initiating component of the denotation of the word “capitalist” which includes the mere support of the capitalist system, the only meaningful exposition of the word “capitalist” is “a person who owns productive capital; owner of economic wealth that is used in business.” An affinity for shopping is connotative of consumerism but it has nothing to do with one being a capitalist. Consumerism unquestionably serves to fuel the capitalist system. But in and of itself your consumerism is no more characteristic of your being a capitalist than is my being debt-free characteristic of my being a capitalist.
*
avbornbred: “If Cybertariat actually lived in the real world [as if I do not live in the real world]; having…a mortgage and rais[ing] a family, he may not be the…Marxist…that he is.”
Despite it being quite true that I have no amount of children, my being without a mortgage is a relatively recent development; having paid cash for my present home in 2005. Prior to that, I continuously held at least one mortgage at a time from June of 1979 until July of 2005; having declared myself a Marxist in 1987 – just eight years after becoming a “first time home owner” and a full eighteen years before extricating myself from the grip of banking capitalists.
As for my not having children, does that somehow suggest that those who are without children while standing in support of the capitalist system are but a heartbeat away from withdrawing their support of the capitalist system precisely because they are without children? No. No it means no such thing. All that it means is that avbornfled is not all that bright.
With that having been said, it is nonetheless quite true that, had I spent the past thirty years or so raising children, I may well not have been able to devote the relatively large amount of time that I was able to devote toward the decades-long sociopolitical metamorphosis that saw to my transitioning from the “conservative” Republican that I was thirty-five years ago to the Marxist/DeLeonist that I am today. It is indeed tragically true that the antisocial capitalist system is extremely adept at conditioning workers to keep their necks so far out on the proverbial chopping block that never do they enjoy time enough to so much as question capitalism’s legitimacy, let alone to educate themselves to the point to where they become socialists. Yes, to me, the likes of reading and the attending of college classes, symposiums, lectures and conferences have always been preferable to attending parent-teacher conferences and changing diapers. That I am now completely free of the constraints imposed on me by banking capitalists is liberating in the extreme.
*
May all of this forum’s participants and passive observers enjoy wonderful weekends. I know that I will! :-)
Persevere.
Guy
( send private message )
roxi says...
Guy says: “…Actually, roxi, ….the only meaningful exposition of the word “capitalist” is “a person who owns productive capital; owner of economic wealth that is used in business.” An affinity for shopping is connotative of consumerism but it has nothing to do with one being a capitalist. Consumerism unquestionably serves to fuel the capitalist system. But in and of itself your consumerism is no more characteristic of your being a capitalist than is my being debt-free characteristic of my being a capitalist.”
_____________________
Ha – but am I not gaining capital by accumulating “things”, and from actively ‘buying’ things, am contributing to other people’s income —by spending my income?
Or, when I no longer need the things I bought, I have a yardsale, which again I am contributing to my income via people buy my stuff.
Why Capitalism is failing right now is because of the progression of Austerity measures — to shrink the Gov’t, which has laid-off 1,000 of people – who NOW cannot buy anything – because they don’t have any money!
“The boom, not the slump, is the right time for austerity.” So declared John Maynard Keynes 75 years ago, and he was right. Even if you have a long-run deficit problem — and who doesn’t? — slashing spending while the economy is deeply depressed is a self-defeating strategy, because it just deepens the depression."
—-Paul Krugman – “The Austerity Agenda” ©NYTimes 2012
Yes, I am debt free also – so I do not contribute directly to corporate banking systems who benefit from my debt in the form of high interest rates. It is an exhilarating feeling, to be free of the Corporate Masters — at least in that respect.
(
send private message
)
avbornbred says...
Capitalism seems to be working in Wisconsin. Walker closed a huge deficit without layoffs. Economy doing well there. Other states and maybe the Feds need to follow the model.
( send private message )
Would you like to comment on this blog post? Login to talk back!
AV Town Crier says...
Scary stuff. Yet this plan is underway here in the USA. The goal, it seems is to put as much of the population in large city (centers) It makes it a lot easier to control the masses and monitor our every movement, monitor our communications, etc.
A plan generated by the CA League of Cities wants to do the same. Their plan wants Palmdale to set up housing for 750,000 along Sierra Hwy by the transportation center. So far Mayor Ledford and the City Council have opposed this. But it’s on the table and on the agenda. Coming soon to a town near you!
( send private message )